Legal Opinion
In Re Heckman
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 6, 1928No. Docket No. 1025PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
This is an original application by Albert Heckman for a writ of habeas corpus, praying that he may be discharged from the custody of the warden of the state prison at Folsom.
The application is made on the ground that the petitioner is now illegally confined in said state prison. That the illegality consists in keeping him in confinement after the expiration of the term for which he was sentenced.
The record shows that the petitioner was committed to the state prison at San Quentin on the ninth day of August, 1924; that on or about the twenty-eighth day of August, 1925, the term of imprisonment…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Suckow v. AldersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Chinn v. Superior Court of San Joaquin Cty.California Supreme Court · 1909
- People Ex Rel. Russell v. Town of LoyaltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Matter of Application of StantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- In Re Dal PorteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. DenneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Anderson v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- McCoy v. HarrisUtah Supreme Court · 1945
- People v. ContrerasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Kirk v. SiquierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.