Legal Opinion

In Re Thompson

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 7, 1921No. Crim. No. 1013PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus to obtain release from state prison. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

In the verified petition for a writ of habeas corpus, filed in this matter, it is alleged that the petitioner is unlawfully held in custody by the warden of the state prison at San Quentin, after the expiration of the time when, with the allowance of credits earned, his term of imprisonment expired. His allegation is that he has “earned” all the credits provided for by the rules regu lating the government of prisoners at the prison, and that none have been forfeited.

The petitioner’s contention is based upon an erroneous theory of the present law governing such matters. Formerly a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. State Ex Rel. McCoske v. KinnearWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. In Re DanielsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Pareses v. California State Board of Prison DirectorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Ex Parte DaltonIdaho Supreme Court · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API