Legal Opinion
Procter & Gamble Co. v. Nabisco Brands, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided October 21, 1988No. Civ. A. 84-333 LONPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LONGOBARDI, District Judge.
An initial examination of this motion and all the related briefs and correspondence may leave one overwhelmed by the seeming complexity of the matters involved. Upon closer analysis, however, the reader can peel away the layers of empty verbiage and expose the gravamen of the issue. Once done, the jumble of eonclusory statements tumbles like a house of cards.
This motion involves three patents owned by Plaintiff The Procter & Gamble Company (“P & G”): U.S. Patents Nos. 4,344,969 (“ ’969”), 4,455,333 (“ ’333”) and 4,503,080 (“’080”). Patent ’969 was issued on…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States v. Francis P. Long, A/K/A "Red", John Hackett, A/K/A "Jack"Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- In Re Paolo LongiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Earl Edward HadawayCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Symbol Technologies, Inc. v. Aruba Networks, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2009
- Sun Microsystems, Inc. v. Versata Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2009
- Fesnak & Associates, LLP v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- Consolidated Aluminum Corp. v. Foseco International Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- McNeil-PPC, Inc. v. Perrigo Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.