Legal Opinion
McNeil-PPC, Inc. v. Perrigo Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 3, 2007No. 05 Civ. 1321(WHP)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, District Judge.
McNeil-PPC, Inc. (“McNeil”), Merck & Co., Inc. (“Merck”) and Johnson & Johnson • Merck Consumer Pharmaceuticals Co. (“Johnson & Johnson • Merck”) (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) bring this action pursuant to the Hatch-Waxman Act, 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(2), against Perrigo Company, L. Perrigo Company and Perrigo Research & Development Company (collectively, the “Defendants” or “Perrigo”). Plaintiffs accuse Perrigo of infringing U.S. Patent No. 5,817,340 (the “'340 patent”) by filing Abbreviated New Drug Application (“ANDA”) No. 77-355…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. And E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Hollister IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Molins Plc, and John Coventry Smith, Jr. v. Textron, Inc., Kearney & Trecker Corporation, and Avco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Roche Palo Alto LLC v. Apotex, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2007
- Metso Minerals, Inc. v. Powerscreen International Distribution Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Santarus, Inc. v. Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- Mentor Graphics Corp. v. Eve-USA, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2014
- PPC Broadband, Inc. v. Corning Gilbert Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2014