Legal Opinion
Consolidated Aluminum Corp. v. Foseco International Ltd.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 6, 1989No. 82 C 2792PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WILL, District Judge.
This patent infringement case was transferred to our docket on January 4, 1989 from the Honorable Ann C. Williams for the purpose of reviewing the parties’ objections to Magistrate Elaine E. Bucklo’s Report and Recommendations (“RR”), pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 53(e)(2), issued on October 31, 1988 following a six week non-jury trial. Magistrate Bucklo found several of the claims in three of Consolidated Aluminum Corporation’s (“Consolidated”) six patents valid and willfully infringed by defendants Foseco Incorporated (“Foseco”) and Foseco International…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Ssih Equipment S.A. v. United States International Trade Commission and Stewart-Warner CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- New Hampshire Bankers Ass'n v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Graco, Inc. v. Binks Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Consolidated Aluminum Corp. v. Foseco International Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Gargoyles, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Perseptive Biosystems, Inc. v. Pharmacia Biotech, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. v. Promega Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.