Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butuer
The question presented is whether the Circuit Court of Appeals rightly applied the maxim, He who comes into equity must' come with clean hands.
Petitioner owns five patents which may be conveniently identified as .the Clutter patent and the four Downie patents. * They all cover devices constituting parts of a ditching machine operated on the principle of a mechanical hoe or mattock. The Clxitter patent is basic and the Downie patents are for claimed improvements.
Prior to the commencement of these suits, the petitioner brought a suit in the Eastern Division of the Northern Ohio District against…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Leeds & Catlin Co. v. Victor Talking MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Deweese v. ReinhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Bein v. HeathSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
- Clarke v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Carrington v. the Brig Ann C. PrattSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by534 opinions
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Pinter v. DahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Trump v. J. G. G.Supreme Court of the United States · 2025
529 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.