Legal Opinion

Knox v. Bogan

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 28, 1996No. 2515PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

The appellants’ (Knoxes) complaint alleges they are the owners of property adjacent to land of the respondent (Bogan) and that Bogan has trespassed upon their land in two locations. They ask for actual and punitive damages against Bogan. Bogan answered the complaint with a general denial, and counterclaimed for a court determination of the boundary line between the parties’ properties. The two areas in dispute are hereinafter referred to as the northern and southern tracts. The trial court determined the matter before it was “an action in trespass to try title.” The court…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Beaufort Land & Investment Co. v. New River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
  3. Davis v. MonteithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  4. Wigfall v. FobbsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  5. Klapman v. HookSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mealey v. ArndtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  2. Coker v. CummingsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  3. Morrow v. DychesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  4. Clark v. HargraveCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  5. Jordan v. JudyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API