Jordan v. Judy
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtKonduros, J.
In this boundary dispute action, Betty L.S. Judy appeals the trial court’s setting of the boundary line, contending it was arbitrary and the only reasonable inference was the boundary should be set where prior plats and surveys showed it. We affirm.
FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Wilbur L. Judy, Sr. and John A. Howell, Jr. owned adjoining tracts of land in Dorchester County (the Judy Property and the Howell Property, respectively). In the early 1970s, Interstate 95 was constructed next to their properties. They both allowed the Department of Transportation to remove dirt from their respective…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Chapman v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
- Gardner v. MozingoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- Okatie River, L.L.C. v. Southeastern Site Prep, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Click Properties, LLC v. Thomas SC Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2025
- Crescent Homes SC, LLC v. CJN, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2024
- Marshall Griffin v. Tony FiovinoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2025
- Marshall Griffin v. Tony FiovinoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2025
- Portrait Homes v. Pennsylvania National MutualCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2023