Legal Opinion
Mealey v. Arndt
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided September 30, 2003No. 1 CA-CV 02-0424PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMPSON, Judge.
¶ 1 This matter involves a boundary dispute between adjacent landowners. Appellants Jim and Anita Arndt appeal from a jury verdict awarding them neighbors, appellees Harry and Linda Mealey, a strip of property to which the Arndts hold record title. The Arndts contend that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict for the Mealeys on the theory of boundary by acquiescence. Because we conclude that there was insufficient evidence to support the finding that a definite, clear, visible boundary existed as required under the doctrine of boundary by…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hutcherson v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1998
- Craig v. AmbroseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Heuertematte v. . MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- City of Deadwood v. Summit, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Hyatt Regency Phoenix Hotel Co. v. Winston & StrawnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Higgins v. Assmann Electronics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Booth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Lashonda M. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Lashonda M. v. Arizona Dept. of Economic SEC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Andrea F., Joshua W. v. Dcs, E.W.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.