Legal Opinion

Morrow v. Dyches

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided September 29, 1997No. 2729PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CURETON, Judge.

Michael and Johnnie Ruth Morrow (the Morrows) appeal from the special referee’s order denying them an easement over adjoining property by either prescription, necessity, grant, or reservation. We affirm.

I. FACTS

The Morrows are the owners of real property in Hilda, S.C., on which they operate a small grocery store. Although S.C. Route 304 borders the Morrows’ property on its eastern side, the northern and western sides of the property are bordered by parcels owned by Terrell Dyches, Jr. (Dyches), and the southern side of the Morrows’ property is bordered by a tract owned by…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Noisette v. IsmailSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. McGee v. Bruce Hospital SystemSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  4. Horry County v. LaychurSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  5. Brasington v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bundy v. ShirleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
  2. Hartley v. John Wesley United Methodist ChurchCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  3. Kelley v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
  4. Loftis v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  5. Pittman v. LowtherCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API