Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Jarrett v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1994No. 93-868PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Claimant seeks a writ of mandamus to compel an award of permanent total disability compensation. See State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666. The commission and employer seek reinstatement of the commission’s order. For the reasons to follow, we affirm the judgment below.

We find initially that the commission’s order violates Noll. Claimant has a fairly low physical impairment and is relatively young — factors that militate against permanent total disability. The commission’s order, however, also lists claimant’s extremely limited education and unskilled work…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Gay v. MihmOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Waddle v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State ex rel. Blake v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pass v. C.S.T. Extraction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Bell v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State ex rel. Bell v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State ex rel. Pass v. C.S.T. Extraction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API