Legal Opinion

Strawberry Point Bank v. Lee

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1898PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Clinton; Daboll, J. Assumpsit by the Strawberry Point Bank against E. C. Lee and others upon a promissory note. Prom a judgment for defendants on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, C. J.

Plaintiff, a corporation of Iowa, brought suit upon a note executed by the defendants for $1,600, payable to “A. B. Holbert, or order, of Greeley, Iowa.” The note also contained the following',provision:

“Interest payable annually, and interest at the rate aforesaid upon such interest after the- same becomes due, until paid; and we agree, if this note is not paid when due, and the holder sues the same, to pay a reasonable sum as attorney’s fees, to be assessed by the court, and taxed as a part of the cost, in any suit brought thereon.”

The defense was that the note was obtained by fraud.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sperry v. HorrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  2. Cayuga County National Bank v. PurdyMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Altman v. RittershoferMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Cox v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. Shenandoah National Bank v. MarshSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bardsley v. Washington Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. In Re Estate of LucasMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Hobbs v. LudlowIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Bombolaski v. First National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API