Legal Opinion
Shenandoah National Bank v. Marsh
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided October 12, 1893PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Appeal from Iracas District Court. — Hon. E. L. Burton, Judge. Action on a promissory note. There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtKinne, J.
The plaintiff’s action is brought upon a promissory note, which reads:
“Chariton, Iowa, July 16, 1890.
“On January 16,1891, for value received, we jointly and severally promise to pay A. H. Warren, or order, one hundred and fifty-one dollars, payable at the First National Bank of Chariton, Iowa, with interest at the rate of eight per cent, per annum from date until paid, and ten per cent, attorney’s fees, if placed in attorney’s hands for collection. The interest on this note is payable annually, and this entire note to be due when there is interest due and unpaid. All delinquent interest to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Montgomery v. CrossthwaitSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Heard v. Dubuque County BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
- Seaton v. ScovillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Sperry v. HorrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- Stoneman v. PyleIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Chandler v. KennedySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
- Cudahy Packing Co. v. State Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Culbertson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- Hutson v. RankinIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
- First National Bank v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.