Robinson v. Weyerhaeuser Co.
North Carolina Industrial Commission
1Dissent
I disagree with the majority's conclusion that plaintiff has asbestosis and that this case should be remanded to reconsider plaintiff's entitlement to 104 weeks of benefits pursuant to § 97-61.5(b) under an estoppel theory. The prerequisites for an order of removal under § 97-61.5(b) are:
Diagnosis of asbestosis or silicosis; and
Current employment that exposes plaintiff to the hazards of asbestosis or silicosis.
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-61.5(b); see Austin v. Continental GeneralTire, 141 N.C. App. 397, 540 S.E.2d 824 (2000) (J. Greene, dissenting),reversed and adopting dissenting opinion, 354 N.C.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings YarnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Young v. Hickory Business FurnitureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- Barber v. Babcock & Wilcox Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Young v. . Whitehall Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.