Legal Opinion
John Doe, I Jane Doe John Doe, II v. Bill Tandeske Gregg D. Renkes
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 17, 2004No. 99-35845PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Per curiam
This is the second time this case has been before this court. See Doe v. Otte, 259 F.3d 979 (9th Cir.2001), rev’d and remanded, Smith v. Doe, 538 U.S. 84, 123 S.Ct. 1140, 155 L.Ed.2d 164 (2003). The first time, we overturned the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the State and held that Alaska’s sex offender registration and notification statute, 1994 Alaska Sess. Laws 41, violated the Ex Post Facto Clause as to plaintiffs who were convicted of crimes before the enactment of the statute. Otte, 259 F.3d at 979. Our resolution of the Does’ ex post facto claim made it unnecessary for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- John Doe I, Jane Doe, and John Doe II v. Ronald O. Otte and Bruce M. Amended BotelhoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
3Cited by62 opinions
- David Litmon, Jr. v. Kamala HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- John Doe v. James T. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- John Doe, Xiv v. Michigan Department of State Police and Col. Tadarial Sturdivant, Director, Michigan State PoliceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Doe v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- United States v. Juvenile MaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.