Legal Opinion
Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. Doe
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 5, 2003No. 01-1231PublishedCited by 463 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rehnquist
We granted certiorari to determine whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit properly en*4joined the public disclosure of Connecticut’s sex offender registry. The Court of Appeals concluded that such disclosure both deprived registered sex offenders of a “liberty interest,” and violated the Due Process Clause because officials did not afford registrants a predeprivation hearing to determine whether they are likely to be “currently dangerous.” Doe v. Department of Public Safety ex rel. Lee, 271 F. 3d 38, 44, 46 (2001) (internal quotation marks omitted). Connecticut,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Wisconsin v. ConstantineauSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- McKune v. LileSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by463 opinions
- Lawrence v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Brown v. MontoyaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Aurelio Duarte v. City of Lewisville, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- Packingham v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- United States v. SkoienCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
458 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.