Legal Opinion
David Litmon, Jr. v. Kamala Harris
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 14, 2014No. 12-15261PublishedCited by 183 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
California law requires “every person who has ever been adjudicated a sexually violent predator” to appear before local law enforcement every 90 days for the rest of their lives to verify certain identifying information. See CaLPenal Code § 290.012(b). We consider various constitutional challenges to this registration requirement.
I. Background
David Litmon, Jr., admitted to raping four women and severely beating another in the 1970s. Upon his release from prison, he sexually assaulted two underage girls. After serving his second sentence, he was adjudicated a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Ralph E. Thornton Cheryl A. Thornton v. City of St. Helens Warren Baker Brian LittleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Joseph L. Pena v. Booth Gardner Lawrence Kincheloe Warden John Lambert Amos ReedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Roy Richard Dittman v. State of California State and Consumer Affairs Agency Medical Board of California Acupuncture Committee and Marilyn NielsenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by183 opinions
- Darby v. GreenmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
- State v. Petersen-BeardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
- Does v. Lawrence WasdenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Millard v. RankinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Ronald Taylor v. San Diego CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
178 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.