Legal Opinion
John Doe v. James T. Moore
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided June 6, 2005No. 04-10279PublishedCited by 148 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIRCH, Circuit Judge:
In this putative class action, initiated by ten John Does and one Jane Doe (collectively “Appellants”) on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, we determine whether Florida’s sex offender registration/notification scheme (“Sex Offender Act”) and DNA collection statute (“DNA Statute”), codified in relevant parts at Fla. Stat. §§ 943.043, .0435, .325, 944.606, violate the Appellants’ constitutional right to due process, equal protection, travel, separation of powers, and freedom from ex post facto legislation. The district court granted the state’s motion to…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hamdi v. RumsfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by148 opinions
- Bingham v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Adam Keith Waldman v. Alabama Prison CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- Nicholas v. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- United States v. AmbertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- John Doe, Xiv v. Michigan Department of State Police and Col. Tadarial Sturdivant, Director, Michigan State PoliceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.