Legal Opinion

John Doe I, Jane Doe, and John Doe II v. Ronald O. Otte and Bruce M. Amended Botelho

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 8, 2001No. 99-35845PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

This case involves an extremely sensitive and difficult question, both from a social and legal standpoint. How may society deal with convicted sex offenders after they have been punished for their crimes? How can society protect itself against future offenses and at the same time safeguard the constitutional rights of persons who have fully paid the price imposed by law for their crimes? The issues treated in the Alaska Sex Offender Registration Act we consider here differ only in degree from a host of other issues the citizens of this country regularly face in trying…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  5. Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. David Litmon, Jr. v. Kamala HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. People v. CorneliusIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Doe v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2008

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API