Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Daily Servs., L.L.C. v. Morrison (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 2018No. 2017-0251Published

1DissentKennedy, J.

{¶ 29} Because the plain language of former Ohio Adm.Code 4123-17-02, 2006-2007 Ohio Monthly Record 1-79, effective July 27, 2006, compels the conclusion that appellee, Daily Services, L.L.C., did not wholly succeed I-Force, L.L.C., in the operation of its business, I dissent. Accordingly, I would affirm the judgment of the Tenth District Court of Appeals granting a writ of mandamus to compel the Bureau of Workers' Compensation ("BWC") to vacate its order finding that Daily Services is I-Force's successor-in-interest.

{¶ 30} R.C. 4123.32 directs appellant, the administrator of the BWC, to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sears v. WeimerOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Symmes Township Board of Trustees v. SmythOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State Ex Rel. K & D Group, Inc. v. BuehrerOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  4. In Re A.J.Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State ex rel. H.C.F., Inc. v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API