State ex rel. Daily Servs., L.L.C. v. Morrison (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentKennedy, J.
{¶ 29} Because the plain language of former Ohio Adm.Code 4123-17-02, 2006-2007 Ohio Monthly Record 1-79, effective July 27, 2006, compels the conclusion that appellee, Daily Services, L.L.C., did not wholly succeed I-Force, L.L.C., in the operation of its business, I dissent. Accordingly, I would affirm the judgment of the Tenth District Court of Appeals granting a writ of mandamus to compel the Bureau of Workers' Compensation ("BWC") to vacate its order finding that Daily Services is I-Force's successor-in-interest.
{¶ 30} R.C. 4123.32 directs appellant, the administrator of the BWC, to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sears v. WeimerOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Symmes Township Board of Trustees v. SmythOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State Ex Rel. K & D Group, Inc. v. BuehrerOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- In Re A.J.Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- State ex rel. H.C.F., Inc. v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.