Legal Opinion
State ex rel. H.C.F., Inc. v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided January 7, 1998No. 95-714PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Per curiam
The dispositive issue in this cause is, Did former Ohio Adm.Code 4123-19-03(M) require HCF to buy Crestview and Piketon out of the State Insurance Fund? For the reasons that follow, we hold that HCF is not subject to former Ohio Adm.Code 4123-19-03(M), because it was not a succeeding employer under former Ohio Adm.Code 4121-7-02(B)(l), nor did it merge with Crestview and Piketon. Accordingly, we affirm the court of appeals’ judgment and issue a writ of mandamus vacating the Board Subcommittee’s order. Thus, we do not reach the due process claims in HCF’s cross-appeal.
Former Ohio Adm.Code…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Welco Industries, Inc. v. Applied CompaniesOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
- State ex rel. Lake Erie Construction Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State Ex Rel. City of Cincinnati v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Reider's, Inc. v. Industrial Commission of OhioOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cytec Industries, Inc. v. B.F. Goodrich Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002
- Dana Partners, L.L.C. v. Koivisto Constructors & Erectors, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State ex rel. H.C.F., Inc. v. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. Daily Servs., L.L.C. v. Morrison (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- Dedicated Nursing Associates, Inc. v. Buckeye Forest at Akron LLC, et al.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2026
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.