In Re A.J.

{¶ 1} In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether a children-services agency followed Ohio Adm.Code 5101:2-42-05 and 5101:2-42-18, which set forth conditions for the placement of a child with a suitable relative in a substitute-care setting. The plain language of the administrative code provisions does not *219support the interpretation proposed by appellant, Brittany J. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the Third District Court of Appeals.

Relevant Background

{¶ 2} Brittany gave birth to A.J. in July 2014 while serving the first month of a nearly five-year prison sentence for robbery in…