Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. K & D Group, Inc. v. Buehrer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 2013No. 2011-1918PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Appellant, K & D Group, Inc., filed a complaint in mandamus in the Franklin County Court of Appeals alleging that the Bureau of Workers’ Compensation abused its discretion when it transferred part of the experience rating of Mid-America Management Corporation (“Mid-America”) to K & D Group, Inc., as successor in interest.

{¶ 2} For the reasons that follow, we hold that K & D Group, Inc., was not a successor in interest for purposes of workers’ compensation law. Thus, the bureau abused its discretion when it transferred part of Mid-America’s experience rating to K & D Group, Inc. We…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Lake Erie Construction Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State ex rel. Crosset Co. v. ConradOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State Ex Rel. Valley Roofing, L.L.C. v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 2009

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Daily Servs., L.L.C. v. Morrison (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State ex rel. Daily Servs., L.L.C. v. BuehrerOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. AWL Transport, Inc. v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. State ex rel. RFFG, L.L.C. v. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State ex rel. Aero Pallets, Inc. v. Bur. of Workers' Comp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API