Legal Opinion

Brinkley v. John A. Hambleton & Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 17, 1887PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtAlvey, C. J.

This was an action of assumpsit instituted by Joseph B. Brinkley, since deceased, against the defendants to recover money alleged to have been paid by the plaintiff, Joseph B. Brinkley, for the use of the defendants. Before the trial below Joseph B. Brinkley died, and John H. Brinkley, his executor, was made party plaintiff in his stead.

The ease was tried before the Court upon an agreed statement of facts, upon which the Court decides as upon a special verdict or upon a demurrer. Keller vs. The State, 12 Md., 322, 327. The judgment was for the defendants and the plaintiff has appealed.

The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Webster v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Keller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1858
  3. Johnson v. . UnderhillNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  4. Hall v. United States InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1847
  5. McKim v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Broderick v. AaronNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Hospelhorn v. PoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  3. Tyson v. Western National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
  4. Mayor of Baltimore v. PeatCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
  5. Penna. Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API