Legal Opinion
Broderick v. Aaron
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 22, 1934PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.
In an action brought by the Superintendent of Banks to enforce the statutory liability of stockholders of the Bank of United States (Banking Law [Cons. Laws, ch. 2], §§ 80 and 120) the members of the firm of Greer, Crane & Webb are named as defendants. That firm appears by the books of the bank to be holders of thirty shares of the stock of the bank. The defendants, so named, had sold the stock to the firm of J. K. Rice, Jr., & Co. before the closing of the bank, and they have impleaded the members of that firm, on the ground that the buyers will be hable to them for the claim made against…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Johnson v. . UnderhillNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Currie v. . WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Brinkley v. John A. Hambleton & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1887
- Richards v. . RobinNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Richards v. RobinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
3Cited by25 opinions
- White v. AdlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Brown v. RosenbaumNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Broderick v. Alexander (Kahn)New York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Eightway Corp. v. Dime Savings BankCivil Court of the City of New York · 1978
- Consolidated Edison, Inc. v. Northeast UtilitiesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.