Hospelhorn v. Poe
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtParke, J.
The action against Philip L. Poe, individually, and trading as Philip L. Poe & Co., and J. Emory Coekey, who- was nht summoned, proceeded to a judgment in favor of Philip L. Poe, after the court had held the declaration bad on demurrer. The appeal is by the receiver. The questions on this appeal and those on three other appeals now pending on the current docket are so similar that, in order to prevent repetition, the various questions will be discussed in this opinion, but appropriate judgments will be entered separately in every case. Hospelhorn v. Boyce, 174 Md. 275, 198 A. 597; Hospelhorn…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Richmond v. IronsSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Golden v. CervenkaIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
- Pauly v. State Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Early v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Marsch v. Southern New England RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Traylor v. GraftonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- A. S. Abell Co. v. SkeenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Allers v. TittsworthCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Howell v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Garfinkel v. SchwartzmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.