Legal Opinion

Mayor of Baltimore v. Peat

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 18, 1901PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Baltimore City Court (Sharp, J.)

1Opinion of the CourtSchmucker, J.

The appellant was the original lessee of a lot of ground in Baltimore City under a ninety-nine years’ lease containing the usual covenant on the part of the lessee to pay the rent as it matured. The term created by this lease came to be vested in the appellee by assignment. The appellant by reason of its liability under the covenant was compelled to pay certain instalments of rent which matured after the assignment and it brought the present action to recover from the assignee the amount so paid. The declaration was in assumpsit for money paid by the appellant for the use of the appellee.

The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lannay v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  2. Wagner v. CohenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1847
  3. Hintze v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1855
  4. Consumers' Ice Co. v. William H. H. Bixler & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
  5. Nickel v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Williams v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
  2. Gallagher v. BellCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. Insley v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  4. Jones v. BurgessCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  5. Union Trust Co. v. RosenburgCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API