Legal Opinion

William C. Brown Co. v. General American Life Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 24, 1990No. 89-54PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVORATO, Justice.

Insurance companies are increasingly using so-called “other insurance” provisions to limit or eliminate their liability if the insured has other insurance. In this case a claimant was covered as a dependent under her husband’s employee group health plan. The claimant was also insured under an individual policy, which was issued to her after she exercised a conversion privilege in her own employee group health plan. The husband’s plan had an “other insurance” provision commonly referred to in insurance industry parlance as coordination of benefits (COB). The COB provision…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  2. Burcham v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  3. Union Insurance Co. v. Iowa Hardware Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  4. Motor Vehicle Casualty Co. v. LeMars Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  5. Gibson v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nahom v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  2. DeVetter v. Principal Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  3. Arkansas Poultry Federation Insurance Trust v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CramerNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  5. ARKANSAS POULTRY FED. INS. TR. v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API