Legal Opinion

Gibson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 26, 1974No. 47,103PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harman, C.:

This is an action against an insurer under a group plan to recover further benefits for medical expense incurred by plaintiffs. The issue is the applicability of a coordination of benefits clause contained in the policy. The insurer prevailed and the certificate holders have appealed.

The entire matter was submitted for determination by the trial court upon an agreed statement of facts, as follows:

“1. The Metropolitan Life Insurance Company issued its Group Insurance Policy, No. 20783-G, with an effective date of July 1, 1961, to the American…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McKay v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesWyoming Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Medical-Dental Service, Inc. v. BorooIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Marett v. World Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  4. Ogden v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  5. Dina v. Ætna Life InsuranceNassau County District Court · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Simms v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1984
  2. Royal College Shop, Inc., a Kansas Corporation, and Thomas H. Black, Cross-Appellees v. Northern Insurance Co. Of N.Y., Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  3. Starks v. Hospital Service Plan of NJNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
  4. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. BriggsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  5. Barker v. Coastal States Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API