Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Cramer
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided July 29, 1993No. 22965PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The instant controversy requires us to determine whether NRS 689A.230(2) applies to a catastrophic medical expense rider issued by appellant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company to the respondent, Ronald Cramer. We conclude that it does not and reverse the entry of partial summary judgment in favor of Cramer and the denial of State Farm’s motion for summary judgment.
FACTS
The facts are not disputed. On November 7, 1987, Cramer was injured in an automobile collision and incurred a total of $35,120.95 in medical expenses. At the time of the accident, Cramer had medical expense…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Ellison v. California State Automobile Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 1990
- SENTENEY BY SENTENEY v. Fire Ins. ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 1985
- Starks v. Hospital Service Plan of NJNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- American Family Life Assurance Co. Of Columbus v. Blue Cross of Florida, Inc., and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- William C. Brown Co. v. General American Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1990
4Cited by4 opinions
- Montana Refining Co. v. National Union Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1996
- Hunt v. AAA Nev. Ins. Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 2019
- Arum v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Miranda v. State Farm General Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025