Nahom v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GERBER, Judge.
In these consolidated appeals, we must determine whether a hospital which has contracted with a patient’s insurer to accept a fixed amount is entitled to additional payments from the patient’s other insurance. We concur in the trial court’s determination that Appellant Herzel Nahom (“Nahom”) was a third-party beneficiary of the contract between Scottsdale Memorial Hospital (“Scottsdale Memorial”) and Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. (“Blue Cross”). This contract limited Scottsdale Memorial’s payment to a fixed amount. We affirm the trial court’s grant of…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Sparks v. Republic National Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Ortiz Alvarado v. Great American Life Assurance Co. PRSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2011
- Golchin v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
- Haisch v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Lopez v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- In re MH 2006-000749Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.