Legal Opinion
Kurinij v. Hanna & Morton
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 10, 1997No. B101724PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HASTINGS, J.
In April 1994, Wasyl Kurinij filed a legal malpractice complaint against respondent, the law firm of Hanna and Morton (H&M) claiming that H&M had negligently represented him in litigation arising out of his acts as a former owner of the company USA Petroleum Corporation. In turn, H&M filed a cross-complaint against appellant Kurinij and his wholly owned corporation, Wasyl, Inc., seeking approximately $1 million in unpaid attorneys fees. H&M successfully moved for summary judgment on the complaint and on the cross-complaint. Kurinij and Wasyl, Inc. (collectively referred to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re Marriage of ArceneauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Tiernan v. Trustees of California State University and CollegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- United Community Church v. GarcinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Null v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Nichols v. KellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Berryman v. Merit Property Management, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Tuchscher Development Enterprises, Inc. v. San Diego Unified Port DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Yield Dynamics, Inc. v. TEA Systems Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Slovensky v. FriedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Okorie v. L. A. Unified Sch. Dist., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.