Legal Opinion
Bracken v. Fidelity Trust Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 12, 1914No. 3278PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Brro'r from District Court, Kiowa County; James R. Tolbert, Judge. Action by the Fidelity Trust Company against Solon Bracken and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
HARRISON, C.
This was an action by the Fidelity Trust Company against Solon Bracken and others to recover on a promissory note. The note in question was executed by the makers as a part payment for a certain Perdieron stallion, which the makers of the note had purchased from McLaughlin Bros, at an agreed price of $3,600; the note being as follows: $1,200.00.
“Mountain Park, O. T., Jan. 12, 1906.
“Oct. 1st, 1908, after date, for value received, we jointly and severally promise to pay McLaughlin Bros., or order, twelve hundred dollars at the Citizens’ Bank, Mountain Park, O. T., Avith…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cornish v. WoolvertonMontana Supreme Court · 1905
- Farmers' Nat. Bank of Tecumseh v. McCallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Clevenger v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Randolph v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
- Hegeler v. ComstockSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Security Trust & Savings Bank of Charles City v. GleichmannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Capital City State Bank v. SwiftDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1923
- Union Nat. Bank of Massillon v. MayfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Voris v. GageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Cooper v. RagsdaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.