Legal Opinion
Capital City State Bank v. Swift
District Court, E.D. Oklahoma
Decided May 29, 1923No. 3868PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, District Judge.
This is an action brought by the plaintiff to recover from the defendants on a trade acceptance. The trade acceptance reads as -follows:
“329965. 6 — 10—22.
“1.60 Pro. fees.
“Trade Acceptance.
•“No. 3301.25. Jan. 10, 1922.
“On June 10, 1922, pay to the order of ourselves thirty-two hundred ninety-nine and 65/100 dollars, with interest from said date 5% per annum.
“The obligation of the acceptor arises out of the purchase of goods from the drawer. The acceptor may make this acceptance payable at any bank, banker or trust company in the United States which he may designate.
“If…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Burgess v. SeligmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Railroad Co. v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Oates v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Pana v. BowlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Burns Mortgage Co. v. FriedSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Commercial Credit Co. v. NissenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
- Jockmus v. Claussen & Knight, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1930
- Peterson v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1926
- Burns Mortg. Co. v. FriedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.