Legal Opinion

Union Nat. Bank of Massillon v. Mayfield

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 3, 1918No. 8057PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from District Court, Woods County ; W. O. Crow, Judge. * Action by the Union National Bank against W. A. Mayfield and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSharp, C. J.

At Capron, Okla-, on June 4, 1914, defendants W. A. Mayfield and C. B. Mayfield executed their promissory note to the Geo. O- Richardson Machinery Company of St. Joseph, Mo., in the sum of $835, payable at the Capron State Bank of Cap-ron, Okla.; the provision with respect to the payment of interest being as follows:

“With interest at the rate of 9 per cent, per annum, payable annually, from date until paid; Provided, however, if note is paid on or before maturity, interest shall be only 7 per cent.”

On the back of the note is contained the following printed provision:

“For value received, I…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stutsman County v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Security Trust & Savings Bank of Charles City v. GleichmannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Clevenger v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. Randolph v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  5. Clowers v. SnowdenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mayfield v. George O. Richardson MacHinery Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Capital City State Bank v. SwiftDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Jackson v. FennimoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Lister v. DonlanMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Farm Mortgage & Loan Co. v. MartinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API