Legal Opinion
Looc, Inc. v. Kohli
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided October 9, 1997No. 41, Sept. Term, 1996PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ELDRIDGE, Judge.
This appeal is from an order of the Circuit Court for Baltimore County requiring the petitioners, LOOC, Inc. and Domino’s Pizza, Inc., immediately to comply with a decision and order of the Maryland Commission on Human Relations. 1 Because the circuit court, under the circumstances, erred in ordering compliance with the Commission’s decision and order at this stage in the proceedings, we shall reverse.
I
The controversy began in December 1987, when Prabhjot Kohli applied for a job with Domino as a manager in training. Domino denied his application under a company-wide no-beard…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Commission on Human Relations v. Amecom Division of Litton Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Board of Trustees v. ShermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Highfield Water Co. v. Washington County Sanitary DistrictCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- In Re Nomination Paper of NaderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Waters v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Longshore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Taylor v. Harford County Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Charles County Department of Social Services v. VannCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Pollock v. Patuxent Institution Board of ReviewCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Maryland Board of Physicians v. ElliottCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.