Legal Opinion
In Re Nomination Paper of Nader
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 19, 2004No. Appeal 182 MAP 2004PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
AND NOW, this 19th day of October, 2004, the Order of the Commonwealth Court dated October 13, 2004, is affirmed. The Application For Supersedeas is denied. The Application For Intervention is dismissed as moot.
Justice SAYLOR dissents. Dissenting Statement to Follow. Justice SAYLOR.
On October 19, 2004, a majority of this Court entered a per curiam Order affirming the Commonwealth Court’s decision to set aside the nomination papers of Ralph Nader and Peter Miguel Camejo, thus removing them as candidates of an independent political body for President and Vice President in the general…
3Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Storer v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- People ex rel. Grinnell v. HoffmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
- In Re Nomination Papers of NaderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- State v. ButtsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by20 opinions
- In Re Nomination Petition of FarneseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- In re Nomination Paper of RogersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- In Re Nomination Petition of PaytonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- In re Nomination Petition of VodvarkaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Looc, Inc. v. KohliCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.