Legal Opinion

McCormick v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 10, 1981No. 515-79CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case is before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiffs’ petition fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. After consideration of the briefs, but without oral argument, we grant defendant’s motion.

Plaintiffs received loans from the Farmers Home Administration (FmHA). A farm ownership loan for $47,000 was received by plaintiffs on January 17, 1974, pursuant to 7 U.S.C. § 1922 (Supp. III, 1979). Two farm operating loans of *662$24,100 and $25,700 were received on December 21, 1973, and February 14, 1974, respectively. These loans were…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Somali Development Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  2. Northern Helex Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  3. Kraemer Mills, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  4. TATEM MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. the UNITED STATESUnited States Court of Claims · 1967

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Howard Smithson and Maretta Smithson v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  2. Nutt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
  3. Bass v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
  4. Corrales v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  5. Howard Smithson and Maretta Smithson v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API