Legal Opinion
Nutt v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided May 15, 1987No. Nos. 142-85C, 143-85CPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*347OPINION
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
These two consolidated actions for breach of express and implied-in-fact contract are before the court on defendant’s renewed motion for summary judgment. Argument and supplemental argument have been held. The principal issues, broadly framed, are whether the lending entity has made the Government amenable to suit for breach of contract by incorporating allegedly infracted regulations into a loan document or by stating in the document that it will make or insure future loans or advances to aid the borrower, provided certain conditions are met.
FACTS
Although many facts…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Wright v. City of Roanoke Redevelopment & Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- H.F. Allen Orchards, Elbert B. Schinmann, R.E. Redman & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Howard Smithson and Maretta Smithson v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- St. Christopher Associates, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Kennedy Heights Apartments, Ltd. I v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Last Chance Mining Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.