Somali Development Bank v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtCowen, Chief Judge
This case comes before the court on motions for summary judgment presented by plaintiffs and defendant. Since we conclude that this court lacks jurisdiction because plaintiffs’ claim basically sounds in tort, we grant defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismiss plaintiffs’ petition. Having decided the motions on that ground, we must also dismiss, as having no independent jurisdictional status, defendant’s counterclaim.
A description of the relationship of the parties is somewhat complicated and is summarized below only to the extent necessary for an understanding of this opinion. The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. NeustadtSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Knote v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Kenneth Reed Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- Rough Diamond Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by139 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Fincke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Urban Data Systems, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Juda v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.