Legal Opinion
TATEM MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. the UNITED STATES
United States Court of Claims
Decided November 9, 1967No. 898PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This case was referred to Trial Commissioner Saul Richard Gamer with directions to make findings of fact and recommendation for conclusions of law. The commissioner has done so in an opinion and report filed on August 29, 1967. Plaintiff has filed no exceptions to or brief on this report and the time for so filing pursuant to the Rules of the court has expired. On October 6, 1967, defend ant filed a motion that the court adopt the commissioner’s report to which plaintiff has failed to respond. Since the court agrees with the commissioner’s opinion, findings and recommended conclusion…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Burkhardt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1949
- J. C. Pitman & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Harvey-Whipple, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- MERIDEN INDUSTRIES COMPANY v. the UNITED STATESUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
4Cited by4 opinions
- Raymond Campbell, D/B/A Ray's Photographic Studio v. Tennessee Valley Authority, Defendant-Third Party v. Earl Daniel, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Paul v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- McCormick v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Raymond Campbell, D/B/A Ray's Photographic Studio v. Tennessee Valley Authority, Defendant-Third Party v. Earl Daniel, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970