Mid-Century Insurance v. Hauck
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
This appeal is from a judgment in favor of respondent insurance carrier and involves the interpretation and construction of a policy of insurance. The facts are not in dispute. The controversy arises out of a water skiing accident when respondent’s insured, Larry Hauck, was operating his motor boat and towing his wife, Rebecca Hauck. Mrs. Hauck collided with an irrigation pipe protruding above the water surface and died from the resulting injuries.
Respondent insured Mr. Hauck under its Trident Boat and Yacht Policy. Under coverage C of the policy, respondent agrees “to pay…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PartridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Steven v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. JacoberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Zuckerman v. Underwriters at Lloyd'sCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Harris v. Glens Falls InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- CALIF. ST. AUTO. ASSN. INTER-INS. v. AntonelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Meritplan Insurance v. WoollumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Civil Service Employees Insurance v. KlapperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. StrattonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Mori v. Southern General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.