Legal Opinion

Meritplan Insurance v. Woollum

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 14, 1975No. Civ. 46271PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THOMPSON, J.

This appeal from a judgment in declaratory relief construing the exclusion provisions of an automobile insurance policy presents the constantly recurring issue of whether the particular exclusion clause is “plain, clear and conspicuous” so as to be effective, or is “ambiguous” so as not to deny coverage. Noting that a flood of prior decisional law establishes only that ambiguity lies in the eyes of the beholder and that the vision of judicial beholders differs, we seek the guidance of an unclear body of law previously applied in situations similar to that involved in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. JacoberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Klein v. KleinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Farmers Ins. Exch. v. GeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Farmers Ins. Exch. v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. CockingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Kime v. BarnardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Mid-Century Insurance v. BashCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. California Cas. Indem. Exch. v. HoskinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. AmmarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API