Legal Opinion
People v. Douglas
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 15, 2011PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Since the defendant had not yet completed his originally imposed sentence of imprisonment when he was resentenced, resentencing him to a term which included the statutorily required period of postrelease supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process of law (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]; People v Dawkins, 87 AD3d 550 [2011]; People v Harris, 86 AD3d 543, 543-544 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 859 [2011]; People v Guillen, 85 AD3d 1201, 1202 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 859 [2011]).
The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Rivera, J.E,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. LingleNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. DawkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People of State of New York v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. GuillenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
3Cited by25 opinions
- People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. JohnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. SinghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. AcostaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.