Legal Opinion
People v. John
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 21, 2012PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Since the defendant had not yet completed serving his *897originally imposed sentence of imprisonment when he was resentenced, the resentencing to a mandatory period of post-release supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process of law (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]; People v Warren, 91 AD3d 800 [2012]; People v Ralph, 91 AD3d 796 [2012]; People v Mills, 90 AD3d 1076 [2011]; People v Louis, 90 AD3d 1075 [2011]; People v Edwards, 89 AD3d 1034 [2011]; People v Douglas, 89 AD3d 959 [2011]; People v Dawkins, 87 AD3d 550 [2011]; People v Guillen, 85…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. LingleNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. DawkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. EdwardsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. DouglasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. LouisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013