Legal Opinion
People of State of New York v. Harris
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 5, 2011PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Contrary to the contentions of the defendant, who had not yet completed his originally imposed sentences of imprisonment when he was resentenced, his resentencing to a term including *544the statutorily required periods of postrelease supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process of law (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621, 630-632 [2011]; People v Burgos, 84 AD3d 975 [2011]). Skelos, J.P., Dickerson, Hall, Austin and Miller, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. LingleNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. BurgosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
3Cited by39 opinions
- People v. DouglasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. HarrisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. LouisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. HernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.