Legal Opinion
People v. Dawkins
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 2, 2011PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Since the defendant had not yet completed his originally imposed sentence of imprisonment when he was resentenced, the resentencing to a term including the statutorily required period of postrelease supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process of law (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]). Angiolillo, J.E, Florio, Leventhal and Miller, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. LingleNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
3Cited by65 opinions
- People v. EdwardsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. DouglasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. HarrisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. LouisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.