Legal Opinion
Taplett v. Khela
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 1, 1991No. 25195-3-IPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, C.J.
Rawland Taplett and Mary Taplett (Taplett) brought this action against Bhag Singh Khela and Nachhatter Kaur Khela (Khela) for contribution on partnership debts and recovery on a promissory note. Khela counterclaimed for a partnership winding up and accounting. The trial court concluded that Taplett's claim was not barred by the statute of limitation, ordered Khela to pay Taplett $46,390 and awarded Taplett reasonable attorney fees. Khela appeals. We reverse.
In September of 1978, Khela, Taplett, and Jackie Don Prestridge and Carol Ann Prestridge (Prestridge) entered into an oral partnership…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bennett v. HardyWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Willener v. SweetingWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Smith v. KingWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Bowman v. WebsterWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- Hines v. Data Line Systems, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Malnar v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Malnar v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Finkelstein v. Security Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- Lian v. StalickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- George v. HelliarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.