Legal Opinion

State v. Wilson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1972No. 71-503PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSilbeRT, J.

In substance, the appellant assigned six errors for consideration by the Court of Appeals, which he renews as propositions of law in his argument here:

1. “Where the state * * * in a criminal case has in its possession certain evidence which * * * has not been made available to the defendant it is * * * [error] to overrule a motion for a bill of particulars * * * [seeking to obtain] a detailed statement of the particular acts, conduct, methods, manner or means by which the state claims the defendant committed the alleged act [,] and it is further error * * * to overrule a motion for discovery…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. McGautha v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Boulden v. HolmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Maxwell v. BishopSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. State v. PetroOhio Supreme Court · 1947

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. LeonardOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. TylerOhio Supreme Court · 1990

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API