State v. Tyler
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
R.C. 2929.05(A) requires us to undertake a three-prong analysis of death penalty cases. First, we will review the specific issues raised by appellant with regard to the proceedings below. Second, we will in*26dependently weigh the aggravating circumstances in the case against any factors that mitigate against imposing the death sentence. Third, we will independently consider whether appellant’s sentence is disproportionate to the penalty imposed in similar cases.
I
Supplemental Instruction
Appellant’s first proposition of law deals with a supplemental instruction given the jury during its…
2Cases cited80 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by280 opinions
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. LottOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. MillsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. MadrigalOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Beverly A. Seymour v. Diane Walker,respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
275 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.